Latest Discussions

  • Posted in: Discussion Board

    Thanks Brett, I have come to a similar conclusion but its good to hear others feel the same. The reason being, the non-loadbearing cladding system would otherwise require an FRL where it is within 3.0m from a FSF. It makes sense then that an additonal ...

  • Posted in: Discussion Board

    Hi All I have been looking into this upgrade to current requirements for a change of classification for some time now and I actually dont think the legislation requires you to upgrade everything to current requirements. The applicable building ...

  • Posted in: Discussion Board

    There are always different views on this one. I had a read of Marsdens Law Group summary of the LEC decision in the case of Scarf v Shoalhaven, see below extract: "in short, her Honour found that because the modification application had been determined ...

  • Posted in: Discussion Board

    Hi Tony, I would not consider the pier to be climbable (providing that there are no projections greater than 10mm) or reducing the height of the barrier and as such would consider this compliant. ------------------------------ Sylvia Broadbent Building ...

  • Posted in: Discussion Board

    Hi all, I am looking for opinions on this matter, I have issued a CDC and received correspondence from the council indicating that the property is subject to a flood overlay. Upon revisiting the assessment plan, it became apparent that the lot is ...


The online training and communication platform of AIBS delivering quality professional development.

Click on the logo below to visit AIBSTV.


Our National Partners


Events Calendar